Ford reverses course on removing AM radios from all new cars due to GOP-led Congressional pressure.
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

05/24/2023, 13:12:24

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Anti-conservative fanatics have been trying for decades to neutralize the advantage AM radio talk shows have given to conservatives. Rush Limbaugh et al, started a sea-change in politics which the ACFs were never able to do. 

Countless billionaire-financed efforts by 'Crats to create an effective "liberal" (Marxist) talk-radio network failed miserably since el Rushbo launched in the 1980s. Not one was ever profitable/financially viable. The 'Crats finally got so frustrated  being unable to make use of AM talk radio to further their leftist mass-media propaganda network, they finally decided to simply eradiate AM radio!!

The plan was apparently to induce automakers like Ford, to eradicate AM radios from new cars. I am unfamiliar with the rationale used by Ford for trying to do this (too costly to incorporate non-digital broadcasting hardware?) but I suspect it was mostly wokunism seeping into the upper-echelons of management. 

The AM-radio attack drew immediate intense criticism from lawmakers and the public on many fronts. Congress called hearings and a rare-but-increasing GOP-led bipartisan conclusion was that Ford et al should desist for if nothing else, public safety reasons (AM radio carries the emergency alert broadcast system). Ford just caved. All new cars will continue to be equipped with broadcast AM signal reception. 

Nice try, 'Crats!!

So ends the war by ACFs to take over or destroy AM radio they have waged since talk radio shows first ascended to profound  influence in public policy debates. 







Modified by LateForLunch at Wed, May 24, 2023, 13:18:47


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
Bad idea, or at least bad outcome. There is no place in a free market for such political influence.
Re: Ford reverses course on removing AM radios from all new cars due to GOP-led Congressional pressure. -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: Russ Walden ®

05/24/2023, 13:17:14

Author Profile Mail author Edit






Modified by Russ Walden at Wed, May 24, 2023, 13:17:42


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
That is the libertarian view. But don't the FCC and state/local governments get some say in the matter?
Re: Bad idea, or at least bad outcome. There is no place in a free market for such political influence. -- Russ Walden Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

05/24/2023, 13:25:17

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Political discussions to the side (including libertarian concerns about whether government should get involved in such matters at all) maintaining the emergency broadcast network's existence is arguably a priority of overriding importance. 

In a civil emergency, digital (web-based) broadcasting may not be available to all (most) effected in a disaster. So AM-band reception capability for the general public is a safety issue.

There's no denying it's possible Congress is doing the right thing (protecting conservative advantage in AM mass media) for the wrong reason (CYA) - which has happened before.  







Modified by LateForLunch at Wed, May 24, 2023, 14:14:53


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
As far as I'm concerned, "No!"
Re: That is the libertarian view. But don't the FCC and state/local governments get some say in the matter? -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: Russ Walden ®

05/25/2023, 14:02:44

Author Profile Mail author Edit
LFL,

If the emergency broadcast network is really that important, then let it broadcast on FM also.

Regards,
Russ








Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
I understand. My research says the network currently uses a chain of 80 AM stations, which have less problems staying on the air in widespread power-failures.
Re: As far as I'm concerned, "No!" -- Russ Walden Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

05/25/2023, 20:51:17

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Apparently FM-signal broadcasting requires a lot more power than AM to cover the same area. That's likely one reason for the Feds chose to keep it the way it is. 

For now. 








Modified by LateForLunch at Thu, May 25, 2023, 21:02:22


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page


Forum     Back