Ford reverses course on removing AM radios from all new cars due to GOP-led Congressional pressure. |
| |
|
Post Reply |
|
Forum |
Posted by: LateForLunch ®
05/24/2023, 13:12:24
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
Anti-conservative fanatics have been trying for decades to neutralize the advantage AM radio talk shows have given to conservatives. Rush Limbaugh et al, started a sea-change in politics which the ACFs were never able to do.
Countless billionaire-financed efforts by 'Crats to create an effective "liberal" (Marxist) talk-radio network failed miserably since el Rushbo launched in the 1980s. Not one was ever profitable/financially viable. The 'Crats finally got so frustrated being unable to make use of AM talk radio to further their leftist mass-media propaganda network, they finally decided to simply eradiate AM radio!! The plan was apparently to induce automakers like Ford, to eradicate AM radios from new cars. I am unfamiliar with the rationale used by Ford for trying to do this (too costly to incorporate non-digital broadcasting hardware?) but I suspect it was mostly wokunism seeping into the upper-echelons of management. The AM-radio attack drew immediate intense criticism from lawmakers and the public on many fronts. Congress called hearings and a rare-but-increasing GOP-led bipartisan conclusion was that Ford et al should desist for if nothing else, public safety reasons (AM radio carries the emergency alert broadcast system). Ford just caved. All new cars will continue to be equipped with broadcast AM signal reception. Nice try, 'Crats!! So ends the war by ACFs to take over or destroy AM radio they have waged since talk radio shows first ascended to profound influence in public policy debates.
Modified by LateForLunch at Wed, May 24, 2023, 13:18:47
|
|
Posted by: LateForLunch ®
05/24/2023, 13:25:17
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
Political discussions to the side (including libertarian concerns about whether government should get involved in such matters at all) maintaining the emergency broadcast network's existence is arguably a priority of overriding importance.
In a civil emergency, digital (web-based) broadcasting may not be available to all (most) effected in a disaster. So AM-band reception capability for the general public is a safety issue.
There's no denying it's possible Congress is doing the right thing (protecting conservative advantage in AM mass media) for the wrong reason (CYA) - which has happened before.
Modified by LateForLunch at Wed, May 24, 2023, 14:14:53
|
Posted by: LateForLunch ®
05/25/2023, 20:51:17
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
Apparently FM-signal broadcasting requires a lot more power than AM to cover the same area. That's likely one reason for the Feds chose to keep it the way it is.
Modified by LateForLunch at Thu, May 25, 2023, 21:02:22
|
|
|