AI is not the enemy, but it's close enough for jazz.
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

03/06/2023, 17:08:57

Author Profile Mail author Edit

I have a relative who is an I.T. professional. He holds a minor degree in neurology oddly enough. He turned down a job with the military who tried to recruit him, because he mistrusts the military (go figure). 

He said that we already have the material capability to build an artificial brain with superior capacity to execute more FLOPS (Floating Operations Per Second) than the human brain (@ 20 billion) but that FLOPS are not the key determining factor in superior cognitive ability. That's because electro-mechanical computers use linear networks, and organic brains use associative networks. 

IOW, the human brain functions like a network that actually has 20 billion individual computers all connected and adding information to the computation in real time.  

Eventually a large enough associative network will be built which can defeat a human brain in any computation, so long as the right "question" can be asked. 

That is likely when the Technological Singularity will begin and human beings will discover whether or not artificial intelligence is friendly to Humanity. 

With all due respect to SF author Isaac Azimov, the notion that AI can be constructed to be unable to harm humans has already been shown to be laughable. Asimov was a great writer but a mediocre scientific mind at best. 






Modified by LateForLunch at Mon, Mar 06, 2023, 17:17:12


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
The future won't need us anymore at some point.
Re: AI is not the enemy, but it's close enough for jazz. -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: Ihavenoname ®

03/07/2023, 00:23:58

Author Profile Mail author Edit
Says Bill Joy, one of the co-founders of Sun Microsystems (now defunct). While technologically interesting, it's scary at the same time.







Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
heh Maybe he means...
Re: The future won't need us anymore at some point. -- Ihavenoname Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

03/07/2023, 01:29:16

Author Profile Mail author Edit
...that machine intelligence would be able to resolve most of the larger logistical problems we now struggle with because the machines will be more-efficient thinkers. However, rationalism has limited value in human affairs. Human beings are subject to being influenced strongly by non-rational (and irrational!!) factors. 

When machines start to outthink people in every arena, we will then need to really be worried. 







Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page


Forum     Back