| AZ AG Mark Brnovich won't do anything, despite the letter demanding answers to voter suppression |
|  |
|
Post Reply |
|
Forum |
Posted by: Ihavenoname ®
11/20/2022, 00:42:12
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
RINO Attorney General Mark Brnovich's office just sent a letter to "Malicecopa" County demanding answers to the disaster election that happened on November 8th.
Mark Brnovich has already shown his true colors. He doesn't want to stop and investigate voter fraud.
I even suspect that the 2018 Arizona Secretary of State election was stolen from Steve Gaynor. From an archived Wikipedia article I have:
"On March 8, 2017, Hobbs announced she would run for
Arizona Secretary of State. In the 2018 election, she ran against local businessman Steve Gaynor
in the contest. On November 6, 2018, the Associated Press prematurely called the race on election
night for Gaynor, despite 600,000 ballots left to count statewide. With the race as close as it
was, neither Hobbs nor Gaynor initially claimed victory. In the days to come, Gaynor's lead
narrowed as more and more ballots were counted. On November 16, 2018, Hobbs was officially
declared as the winner by a margin of 20,000 votes."
Doesn't that sound familiar? The problems began even before 2020. Now history repeats itself. Too bad no investigation on the 2018 AZ SOS election was done. Where did those 600,000 ballots came from?
Ducey and Brnovich are not here to serve your best interests. They could careless about your lives. Ducey is truly the Kemp of Arizona.
Brnovich doesn't want to hear your complaints. Seems like he wants you to "shut up and put up."
Unfortunately, nobody in higher positions of power are immune to the temptation of back-stabbing. Just look at Trump's "downfall" during his last few weeks in the presidency.
May Ducey and Brnovich cower in perpetual shame for the rest of their lives after leaving office. They deserve it. Not only for being cowards, but for betraying the trust of the American people. Too bad we don't have a say in how much their final paycheck is.
They should not receive a single penny from taxpayers. Yet, we're legally obligated to pay taxes, and part of that funds their paycheck. And this injustice shall continue for the rest of our lives.
|
|
Posted by: LateForLunch ®
11/20/2022, 05:37:22
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
One of the biggest concerns I had throughout the Trump administration was his failure to effectively distance himself (in the perception of a large swath of voters, it turned out) from oddballs/extremists who glommed on to his presidency. White supremacists, Q-Anon lunatics, conspiracy addicts, et al. It was easy to predict that if serious violence occurred at the 1/6 protests he encouraged in DC, rightly or wrongly he would be blamed. That is exactly what occurred - rioters (either planted instigators or psychotic fools looking for a chance to act out violently) turned the protest into a chaotic shit-show. Mitigations and aggravating players/circumstances aside, DJT should have gone out of his way to discourage violence and disavow kooks with as much enthusiasm as he encouraged outraged protest.
It was to be blunt, a bush-league political mistake that would have had Stalin, Trotsky, Bolivar and Saul Alinsky laughing out loud and Machiavelli covering his face/shaking his head.
I would gladly vote for DJT again to be president if he is the nominee, but that aspect of political policy (if you can even call obliviousness to possible consequences a policy issue) was a terrible political mistake. Thankfully most of what could be seen as serious errors in that administration were in selecting bad staff members and political errors as the one above. The errors were not in foreign policy, management of the military, economy or other tangible public policy mistakes that influenced the nation adversely.
DJT could have learned much by emulating RWR in communications with/attitudes toward the press/adversaries. Sometimes less is more -especially in politics. Even if the opponents are as inept as the 'Crats often are, it's still chess, not checkers. Without sound strategy behind every move, disaster looms always.
Modified by LateForLunch at Sun, Nov 20, 2022, 06:17:15
|
Posted by: Ihavenoname ®
11/20/2022, 11:06:34
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
President Reagan had a charisma that probably won't be seen again. I'd do anything to get a time machine to visit the 1980s (I wasn't born in that decade).With that being said, I suspected that Trump has this "him above everything else" attitude. He always thinks he's right. His personality can't be changed, but he can tone it down to tolerable levels. Would he be willing to do that? That remains to be seen later on. He endorsed many people, including bad candidates. Dr. Oz isn't a real conservative, but another RINO. Why he chose Oz is beyond me. Trump has been making too many judgemental errors lately. And Oz was known to sell some phoney weight-loss pills on TV before. And even if some RINOS understandably despise him, that doesn't give them any excuse to neglect their duties. If the elecion system were fair, it would be true that the citizens has a say in who gets elected. They instead choose to allow voter fraud to happen and betray public trust. Why? Some actions and disclosures of PAC donation funds to certain groups suggests that they would rather enact "crushing hatred" of the MAGA movement first above their duties. Does it matter now? I don't think so, because the damage has been done already, and they (RINOS) are too corrupt to even bother asking. I wish they would set aside their personal feelings and prosecute law breakers like Hobbs. After doing their jobs and leaving office, then they can vent their hatred of Trump all they want. I'll simply ignore them.
Modified by Ihavenoname at Sun, Nov 20, 2022, 11:09:26
|
Posted by: Russ Walden ®
11/21/2022, 13:19:16
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
. . . as Fetterman was damaged goods, it would be "another Trump endorsed candidate wins.
Those are very important to him, Unfortunately, he often endorsed weak candidates, thinking, I suppose, that his endorsement would carry them. This backfired when the Dems supported his candidates in their Primaries, only go go on and defeat them in the General. Six candidates, I believe.
Regards, Russ
|
Posted by: Ihavenoname ®
11/21/2022, 14:04:29
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
Trump should've known not to underestimate opponents. He was rather overly confident and overly optimistic in his choices.
All I learned from this fiasco was that someone with a "Trump-endorsed" sticker on their profile isn't necessarily better than the other candidates.
|
Posted by: DeeDee ®
11/23/2022, 09:09:54
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
The excess ballots, the ballot harvesting and known anti-Trump MCCAINIACS helping count the votes.
|
Posted by: Ihavenoname ®
11/23/2022, 11:47:17
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
And yet we’re denounced as “election deniers” despite undeniable evidence of voter fraud used to get the Trump-endorsed candidates to “lose.”
|
Posted by: LateForLunch ®
11/26/2022, 13:44:17
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
The 'Crats who continue to vote for Xiden et al, either do not believe or have not figured out that this is the "alligator eats you last" scenario come to full, horribly lethal life.
Xiden and his cohorts want to turn the USA into a leftist oligarchy like the PRC. Not a little bit like it, but EXACTLY like it. A nation where the People have zero power and the government has ALL of the power.
|
Posted by: DeeDee ®
11/23/2022, 09:09:30
Author Profile Mail author Edit
|
The excess ballots, the ballot harvesting and known anti-Trump MCCAINIACS helping count the votes.
|
|
|