Google Schmoogle somebody help me understand...
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

12/05/2021, 11:25:31

Author Profile Mail author Edit
...how there is any human being alive with an I.Q. greater than their age, who could possibly believe that Google is a "non-biased" company which does not favor leftists, especially ACFs in every possible way?

As ongoing evidence allow me to present what happens when you enter the words "Fox News" into the Google search engine. What you get is a detailed listing-reference on the left side of the results page with the particulars of the Fox News site, and on the right is a summary box containing a Google-written statement of the company. In the summary statement it says:

"The Fox News Channel, abbreviated FNC, commonly known as Fox News, and stylized in all caps, is an American multinational conservative (Italics/boldface mine-LFL) cable news television channel..."

Note the inclusion of the word "conservative" in that description. Now, do the same with any other cable news television channel (or any other broadcast network) and there will be no reference to political ideology whatsoever. Not for the obviously ultra-liberal (radical anti-conservative) CNN, MSNBC or any other. There is ZERO reference to the fact that those other channels/networks are ultra-liberal (Marxist) in any way. 

The explanation for this must be that Google is trying to exploit the popular misconception maintained by the self-described liberals and ultra-liberals that ONLY conservatives are ideological (biased) but that self-described liberals are "objective". 

One of the things ACFs have succeeded in claiming without any push-back for decades now is the absurd (yea, mendacious) fiction that conservative is a bad word. So they attach it to any entity or person the owners/operators dislike in the attempt to smear them with what they believe to be a negative term for most people. 

One of the successes of the endless Marxist effort to corrupt/subvert the popular lexicon in general is how they have managed to affiliate the term "conservative" with all sorts of horrible things which have absolutely NOTHING to do with it. Leftists routinely conflate conservatism with ultra-fundamentalist Christianity, anti-homosexual bigotry, anti-feminine bigotry, white supremacy, lawless vigilantism, anti-intellectualism and a vast array of other negative things which all have virtually NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with any mainstream self-described conservative movement. 

There is no modern conservative organization or political faction in the USA which embraces any of the above-mentioned bad things. None advocate illegal violence (as many ACF groups like BLM/ANTIFA/OCCUPOO WALLSTREET) do. No modern conservative group advocate rioting (ditto). No conservative groups advocate oppression of or denial of legal rights to ethnic minorities or women or homosexuals. Yet every minute of every day there are so-called "objective" news channels which directly misidentify such groups as Q-ANON, the American Nazi Party, anarchist, anti-government vigilante groups as "conservative" or "ultra-conservative". 

Yet, the democrat party's embracing and funding of organizations/candidates/public figures who openly and blatantly demonstrate support for illegal violence, terrorism, racialist/racist bigotry, fascist oppression, deprivation of Constitutional entitlements, murder, lawlessness, criminal perversion (pederasty) drug-abuse, hatred of the most horrible nature against normal, law-abiding people is ignored by such so-called "news channels". 

So because Google believes the word "conservative" is a negative, they add it to the Google description of Fox News in hopes that it will further the infantile absurdity that only Fox News is ideologically slanted while other non-conservative news companies/channels are wholly objective and unbiased. 

No person in their Right Mind believes that CNN/MSLSD or any of the other so-called "main stream" news channels are objective or "unbiased". Everyone knows full well that they are wholly and utterly anti-conservative (leftist) companies yet Google continues to try to further the mendacity by pretending they are not. 

So who are the "liars" and the "bigots" and the "dangerously radical ideologues"? It's pretty damn obvious it's the 'Crats and their ACF -affiliated cronies. Yet, they continue to get away with it without much challenge from either "educators" or seemingly notice by the general public.








Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
I refuse to have anything to do with that bunch. I never use Google.
Re: Google Schmoogle somebody help me understand... -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: Dee Wee ®

12/06/2021, 16:01:12

Author Profile Mail author Edit








Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
bias
Re: Google Schmoogle somebody help me understand... -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: CiscoKid ®

12/06/2021, 14:35:10

Author Profile Mail author Edit

One thing that I have noticed around where I live is that when local elections roll around the candidates that do not state  what affiliation they are always turn out to be democrats.     I take that as a sign that they, themselves, see their party as toxic and do not want the stigma attached to them.     Didn't work for them this last time as the republicans managed to win despite lots of last minute cheating by the dems.     







Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
Ditto - very astute observation, sieur!
Re: bias -- CiscoKid Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

12/06/2021, 18:37:15

Author Profile Mail author Edit
I have some neighbors who are decent, hard-working, peaceful people - normal except for their 'Crat political leanings. Since the Afghanistan horror, they have been very uh...low key. They no longer put any sort of signs on their property advertising their support for Democrat candidates/causes even during local elections. They seem ashamed of themselves. 

As well they should be...







Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
Ditto
Re: Ditto - very astute observation, sieur! -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: CiscoKid ®

12/07/2021, 13:48:03

Author Profile Mail author Edit
Democrats today are a far cry from democrats 30 years ago.     I refuse to believe that decent people can still support today's democrat party.     If they cannot see what the party has come to represent they are either flat out stupid or they are evil Marxists hell bent on destroying this country and what it stands for.        I have extended family who are no longer welcome for holiday gatherings for precisely this reason.    Good riddance to bad rubbish is how I see it and it is certainly not my loss.    







Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
Liberal media networks can't be biased, just like blacks can't be racist.
Re: Google Schmoogle somebody help me understand... -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: Russ Walden ®

12/06/2021, 13:46:18

Author Profile Mail author Edit






Modified by Russ Walden at Mon, Dec 06, 2021, 13:46:44


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page
You're RIGHT, Primo!! It's a miracle. heh
Re: Liberal media networks can't be biased, just like blacks can't be racist. -- Russ Walden Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

12/07/2021, 04:26:08

Author Profile Mail author Edit

The 'Crats forever will swear that one may achieve moral ends through immoral means. 

Normal people know that is impossible without having to have it explained to them.  






Modified by LateForLunch at Tue, Dec 07, 2021, 04:28:19


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page


Forum     Back