Hey. Poison THIS, you schmuck.
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

11/21/2021, 06:42:17

Author Profile Mail author Edit
A Poisoned Doctrine: Rittenhouse verdict legitimizes claim of self-defense against a self-created danger
Submitted by: mark@keepandbeararms.com">Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com

 
As prosecutor Thomas Binger said in his closing argument: “When the defendant provokes this incident, he loses the right to self-defense. You cannot claim self-defense against a danger you create.”

The Wisconsin jury disagreed, and its decision may portend a similar outcome in another high-profile case in Georgia, where three white men are on trial for the shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery after they claimed the Black man was a suspect in a rash of robberies. Like Rittenhouse, the three men claimed they were acting in self-defense.

 

Comment by: PHORTO (11/21/2021)
Bunkum.

This idiot undoubtedly believes that there is a fundamental right to "feel" a certain way and to use that "feeling" to impose fictitious constructs on others.



LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE

Liberty is paramount. Government is an afterthought.

Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down.





Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
Easily understood...
Re: Hey. Poison THIS, you schmuck. -- TEEBONE Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

11/21/2021, 14:38:57

Author Profile Mail author Edit

..from an elementary strategic perspective - ACFs are perpetually "playing to the jury" by coming up with asinine "explanations" which make no rational sense. Desperate defense attorney's do the same thing (as do some desperate prosecutors, hint, hint).  

The trial of the Butcher of Brentwood was the awakening for black supremacists. They saw how there existed a mechanism (wholly legal no less) in which morality/reason could be circumvented and a person guilty of even something as heinous as double murder could walk free. This was a revelation of exceeding good fortune to savages who, like three-year-olds, believe that "good people" give them what they want, and "bad people" deny them. 

That is the doctrine of black supremacy - the same as the doctrine of three-year-olds. If you don't get what you want - throw a violent tantrum. 

The correct way to deal with them (either one) is to deny them what they demand, and punish them. Better for them, better for society. 

Savages believe they owe the society which created them NOTHING...






Modified by LateForLunch at Sun, Nov 21, 2021, 14:42:49


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page


Forum     Back