Alec Baldwin lied - forensic investigators say trigger was pulled in Rust shooting.
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

08/13/2022, 19:32:13

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Forensics Conclude Trigger Pulled in 'Rust' Shooting | Newsmax.com


The show armoror, sensing that she would be thrown under the bus by Baldwin et al, if they could, smartly reported in the deposition that she was not present when Baldwin took it upon himself to, "procure/point a loaded firearm at a crew member against all protocols and regulations." Oops. 

Baldwin has stated publicly in interviews and (allegedly) in depositions to LEOs that he did not pull the trigger on the firearm, claiming, "It just went off!" He does not even admit to pointing it at the woman he killed, trying to make it look as if the weapon "just went off by accident" when he was merely holding it and it happened to go off by itself when it was accidentally/coincidentally pointed at the victim (all-butt stating that it was a mysterious "gun malfunction"). 

The theory, " it just went off by accident without pulling the trigger," will apparently not fly with LEO forensic examiners. The evidence is that someone (guess who!?!) pointed the gun at the victim and pulled the trigger, killing her. 

As Russ has previously suggested, I agree Alec Baldwin's career as, "on-screen talent" is over. He and the studio who paid him as a "producer" will naturally be dragged through civil suits which will further damage his "brand" in the view of H-Wood casting directors. He will no doubt have to pay out millions in damages before the last of the whole wagon-train of lawyers rolls by.






Modified by LateForLunch at Sat, Aug 13, 2022, 22:09:01


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
The investigators are being very thorough because they know the level of scrutiny will be off-the-scale.
Re: Alec Baldwin lied - forensic investigators say trigger was pulled in Rust shooting. -- LateForLunch Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

08/15/2022, 00:13:57

Author Profile Mail author Edit

In similar cases, charges were not filed against the actor who fired the weapon. Even if no criminal charges brought, that does not immunize the responsible party or parties (Baldwin and production company) from being sued civilly. 

Baldwin is treading on dangerous ground by lying to investigators because that in itself can be described as a criminal act if the authorities want to be "uncooperative" themselves. That is already one count of lying to investigators Baldwin has on his record - one wonders whether he is just poorly advised by legal counsel, is ignoring counsel's advice or is (dumbest choice of three) not consulting with competent, experienced legal counsel at all. 

I once read a description of the job of a good attorney as being, "to get their client to stop doing something they are doing but shouldn't be". Generally LEO investigators/judges/lawyers are fairly smart and VERY difficult to fool. Lawyers can be corrupt, but they are not often stupid - anyone in Baldwin's situation should have the best lawyer/crisis management team he can afford (even if that requires borrowing enough money to afford it). 

One wonders if already being caught in one big "misstatement" (LFL-rolls eyes), Baldwin is smart enough to stop lying. If he does not, eventually he may well get caught lying to a judge/jury and end up paying a VERY high price for his insolence. 






Modified by LateForLunch at Mon, Aug 15, 2022, 01:21:11


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page


Forum     Back