This is downright messed up:
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

10/05/2020, 20:38:28

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Woman sues town officials for hounding her out of office

WND Staff
3-4 minutes

Politics U.S.

Complaint cites violations of 1st, 14th Amendments

WND Staff By WND Staff
Published October 4, 2020 at 1:53pm

A Texas woman has filed a lawsuit alleging officials in her town violated her constitutional rights after she won a seat on the town council.

The complaint alleges city officials, including Castle Hills, Texas, mayor Edward Trevino II and town police chief John Siemens, hounded her out of that office in violation of the First and 14th Amendments.

According to the filing by the Institute for Justice on behalf of Sylvia Gonzalez they:

  • "Claimed she wasn't properly sworn in and replaced Gonzalez on the city council with the woman she'd just beaten."
  • "Used bogus charges and a rarely used law to have Gonzalez arrested, booked, and thrown in jail."
  • Had associates "file a lawsuit claiming Sylvia was incompetent."

TRENDING: As tension grips Capitol Hill, report that Amy Coney Barrett already had COVID emerges

She fought back and won each time, IJ said.

"But by then the damage had been done," IJ said. "Sylvia’s mugshot had been splashed across the news and her reputation dragged through the mud. Exhausted—with tens of thousands of dollars in legal bills—she stopped the fight to reclaim her seat."

Now she's suing the city officials "who abused their power and violated Sylvia's First Amendment right to speak out against government."

"Castle Hills officials seem to believe that they are above the law because they are the law," said Anya Bidwell, an attorney at the Institute for Justice, which represents Sylvia. "But criticism isn’t criminal, it is a constitutional right. And it is patently unconstitutional for an official to use the police to stifle speech and retaliate against political opponents."

A video about her case:

IJ said Gonzalez, 72, had campaigned on the promise to work to make the city more responsive to citizens' needs.

The incumbents didn't like that plan, IJ said. They then "abused their power to retaliate against Gonzalez."

"When the government officials who are charged with upholding the law break it, they have to be held accountable,” said IJ attorney Patrick Jaicomo. “What good are rights without legal remedies? The courts are a necessary check on government power. This lawsuit seeks to give Sylvia an opportunity to have her day in court and stand up for her constitutional rights."

Gonzalez said: "I was arrested and thrown in jail because city officials didn’t like that I criticized them. But being able to disagree with the government is at the heart of our democracy, and I’m here to stand up and make sure others are not silenced the way I was."

The lawsuit asks the court to hold that Gonzalez' constitutional rights were violated when the government arrested her in retaliation for her speech, as well as unspecified damages.


Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down.

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page
What's messed up is that not one-in-1000 people you'd ask on the street know what "Kafkaesque" means...
Re: This is downright messed up: -- TEEBONE Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: LateForLunch ®

10/06/2020, 12:50:18

Author Profile Mail author Edit
...and of those who do, a much smaller percentage will care. 

My concern is that we are as a culture, generally moving toward a state of affairs where people are so overly concerned with convenience and fun, that they will permit the gummint to devolve into fascist Statist oligarchy without so much as a sigh of displeasure from the electorate. 

The fact that a huge portion of the electorate seem to support a Democrat in the 2020 election for president is in itself highly concerning. It is difficult to imagine how any political party guilty of doing all of the horribly, lethally irresponsible things the 'Crats have done in the last four or five years, could possibly be considered preferable to the current administration. 

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page

Forum     Back