Online users
???: Message   

Keep your grubby, statist hands OFF!
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

04/03/2021, 12:03:50

Author Profile Mail author Edit



www.wnd.com

Judge: Government must defend confiscating traveler's cash

WND Staff
4-5 minutes

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has refused a government request to dismiss a lawsuit against the Transportation Security Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration over the confiscation of $82,373 in cash from an innocent traveler.

WND reported money was seized by a bank from Terry Rolin in a nearby state and ended up in government hands.

It was returned, but Rolin filed a class-action lawsuit that will advance with the judge's rejection of the motion to dismiss.

The Institute for Justice said Rolin used boxes and jars to accumulate the cash over many years. His daughter, Rebecca Brown, persuaded him to turn it over to her so she could pay his bills and put the rest in a bank.

The local banks, however, were closed that day, so she planned to take the cash with her on a flight from Pittsburgh to Boston and then deposit it.

The DEA seized the cash at the airport.

IJ explained that when travelers "go online to find out whether it is legal to fly with cash, the government tells them that there are no restrictions on traveling with any amount of money on domestic flights."

"What it does not tell flyers is that, upon seeing cash, Transportation Security Administration screeners will detain them and turn them over to law enforcement, who will take their money without any cause for suspicion and without filing any criminal charges."

Can the government confiscate travelers' cash?

IJ Senior Attorney Dan Alban said TSA and DEA "routinely violate Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights at airports across the country by detaining them for doing something completely legal: flying with cash."

"Seizing and forfeiting someone’s savings should not be done lightly, yet we’ve documented how easy it is for law enforcement to take money at airports without any evidence of a crime," he said. "Now, thanks to our class action lawsuit, we are going to uncover the truth behind how and why the government is targeting innocent flyers, and ultimately put an end to this predatory practice."

The DEA returned Rolin's money after the lawsuit was filed, "but only after holding it for over six months without any accusations of criminality, let alone criminal charges," IJ said.

"Additional named plaintiffs joined the suit in July 2020. DEA seized $43,000 from Stacy Jones at the Wilmington, North Carolina, airport in May 2020 as she was flying home to Tampa. The agency returned her money after she joined the lawsuit and nine months after it was seized. Once again, criminal charges were never filed."

IJ Attorney Jaba Tsitsuashvili said TSA’s and DEA's
unconstitutional conduct across the country suggests that the agencies are more interested in seizing cash than securing safety."

"And these seizures subject people to a confusing bureaucratic process, without an attorney provided, where a single misstep could mean losing their life savings forever," Tsitsuashvili said. "Even those who succeed in getting their money returned are deprived of it for months or years, often upending their lives. No one should lose their money without a criminal conviction."

The motion to dismiss was rejected by U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Horan.

She said the issues to be resolved include whether or not the TSA exceeded its statutory authority by detaining travelers and their cash after the security screening has ended and violated the Fourth Amendment by detaining travelers and their cash without reasonable suspicion of criminality.

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org" target="_top" style="color: rgb(0, 149, 221); text-decoration-line: none;">licensing@wndnewscenter.org.





LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE

Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down.





Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message