"All of this would require that the planet perform the Herculean task of getting a real-wealth system started then extend it to the entire global infrastructure." -- 'Sounds like One World Government by definition.

"All of this would require that the planet perform the Herculean task of getting a real-wealth system started then extend it to the entire global infrastructure." -- 'Sounds like One World Government by definition.
Re: How Real Wealth economics works - or how we build a world where hard work is an option, not a necessity. -- LateForLunch	Post Reply	Top of thread	Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ^Ž

11/24/2020, 11:40:45

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Or, New World Order, if you prefer.

Lunch -

Any regime that is based upon top-down imposition is unacceptable, and incompatible with liberty.

TEE

LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE

Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.
Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down.

Modified by TEEBONE at Tue, Nov 24, 2020, 13:16:23

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert

Where am I? Original Top of thread

Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message

"Any regime that is based upon top-down imposition is unacceptable, and incompatible with liberty." -- Yup, it be. --- Russ Walden ( 11/24/2020, 11:44:38 ) ( 2 bytes ) +1

Fully agree. Fuller designed the system to be implemented by capitalist, free-market innovation, not government edict or decree. --- LateForLunch ( 11/24/2020, 13:37:49 ) ( 899 bytes ) +1

Again, while admittedly a stimulating exercise in "outside-the-box" innovative thinking.... --- TEEBONE ( 11/24/2020, 14:13:56 ) ( 341 bytes ) +1

It's really more akin to the ancient barter system than to Communism. --- LateForLunch ( 11/24/2020, 18:15:39 ) ( 106 bytes ) +1

Yes, but wealth was tangible things like goods and property. That's the crux of the problem with your postulation. It's based upon imaginary, 'virtual' wealth. --- TEEBONE ( 11/24/2020, 18:39:46 ) ( 2 bytes )