Yeah, that about sums it up.
Re: Common sense too rare for it to work. -- DullArmor Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE

11/19/2020, 10:14:00

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Personally, I'm of the belief that the only limit on liberty is the unjustifiable use of it to harm others. If you piss me off I can't justifiably punch you in the nose, but if you swing on me I have the liberty to stop you from harming me. 'Same goes for you. 'Same goes for everyone.

I don't think the government has the legitimate power to prohibit a person from imbibing anything s/he wants, up to and including deliberately inducing one's own death. However, how one behaves regarding the safety/rights of others while under said influence is activity for legitimate regulation.

The states aren't 'entitled' to federal money. Accepting grants is a Faustian bargain, acceding to the possibility of extortion. When the feds say "If you do this, we'll give you that." and a state agrees, it has willingly entered into an agreement that has stipulations and conditions, and there is nothing unconstitutional about the feds withholding funds if the state defaults. There is no constitutional obligation for the national government to subsidize the states. The practice is facially flawed in that making such bargains gives the fedgov powers not delegated to it by the Constitution, but those powers were not accrued by force -- they were handed to the national government voluntarily. If you call the tune you owe the piper, and the 10th Amendment's protection of state sovereignty becomes moot.

The contradictory application of this mechanism is pure politics, but the states can't whine because they acceded to it.

And so on.

TEE




LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE

Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down.



Modified by TEEBONE at Thu, Nov 19, 2020, 11:42:44


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message