Online users
???: Message   

The 2A assumes the right as fundamental and preexisting, you ivory tower nerdule. - (Note the resemblance to Richard Blumenthal and the Harry Potter goblins. Not flattering. <smirk>)
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

02/08/2020, 16:59:28

Author Profile Mail author Edit

History prof: Founders' intent of 2nd Amendment not to guarantee private gun ownership

Caroline Shaver
5-6 minutes

North Carolina Campus Correspondent on Feb 07, 2020 at 12:59 PM EDT

  • An American University professor recently published a book in which he advocates to "repeal the Second Amendment."
  • Allan Lichtman compares the constitutional right to prohibition and says the NRA "hijacked" the Second Amendment.

At American University in Washington DC, a history professor recently wrote a book in which he advocates to "repeal the Second Amendment."

Professor Allan J. Lichtman published his book, Repeal the Second Amendment: The Case for a Safer America,  in January. It focuses on the perceived need to abolish the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Lichtman’s book acknowledges gun violence in America and asserts that “the real problem is that which gun control advocates fear to name: the Second Amendment.” 

“Repeal will take a concerted effort from Americans who are well briefed on the true history of the Second Amendment"    Tweet This

In an excerpt of the book published by MSNBC, the professor writes, “Repeal of the Second Amendment is not only right, but realistic.” He argues that the gun control movement would have an easier path were the Second Amendment repealed. 

[RELATED: UCLA prof: ‘I don’t see the Second Amendment as absolute, just like I don’t see the First Amendment as absolute’]

Lichtman’s also claims that America's founders did not intend through the Second Amendment to guarantee gun ownership rights to individual Americans.  Instead, Lichtman argues that “the NRA hijacked the Second Amendment.” 

He claims that the National Rifle Association redefined the interpretation of the Second Amendment a few decades ago in order to gain profit from gun sales. Before this, Lichtman argues that the general intent of the Second Amendment was to cultivate a militia.

Lichtman includes a call to action, stating that “Americans who care about gun safety must now take it back [the Second Amendment].” He compares the potential to repeal the Second Amendment with the past repeal of prohibition. 

“Repeal will take a concerted effort from Americans who are well briefed on the true history of the Second Amendment," he writes. 

The radical left will stop at nothing to intimidate conservative students on college campuses. You can help expose them. Find out more »

[RELATED: Prof calls for ‘repealing the Second Amendment’ after Vegas]

Lichtman has been named a Distinguished Professor of History by American University and has published other books, including The Case for Impeachment in 2017, which laid out Lichtman’s various arguments for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. 

He was also a consultant for Sen. Ted Kennedy and presidential candidate Al Gore.  

Campus Reform reached out to Lichtman for comment but did not hear back in time for publication.

Lichtman is a prog turd. Progressives (per Woodrow Wilson, the godfather of American progressivism) reject the "self-evident" truth of inalienable rights, and the document that acknowledged their existence. They likewise reject the doctrines of separation of powers, limited enumerated powers, checks and balances and federalism. The core belief of progressivism is a centralized government unencumbered by such niceties as individual liberty. Translation: Marxism/Communism.

And there is no place for them in the United States. They are using the Constitution against itself, a principle best elucidated by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin: "The capitalists will sell us the rope we will use to hang them."

We must say "Not only no, but HELL NO."


Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message