Online users
???: Message   

Someone should tell Portland that if it stops whacking itself in the haid wif a hammer, it won't hurt anymore.
Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

11/17/2019, 09:13:42

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Preacher ejected from Portland park sues city - WND

WND Staff
3-4 minutes


Sending message that constitutional infringements won't be tolerated

WND Staff By WND Staff
Published November 16, 2019 at 1:57pm

The Pacific Justice Institute has filed a lawsuit against the city of Portland, Oregon, "to send a message to the city that further infringements on freedoms of speech and religion will not be tolerated."

"For more than 200 years, the Constitution has protected the freedoms of speech and religion in the public square," explained Brad Dacus, president of Pacific Justice, which is representing Mark Mayberry.

"City officials do not have the authority to silence Christians because their message causes some people discomfort. The city clearly has not learned its lesson; therefore, it’s going to pay a very steep price – that’s the point of this lawsuit."

Mayberry was in Portland's Waterfront Park holding a sign defending the unborn and passing out related brochures when a park officer approached him and ordered him to leave the public park.

TRENDING: Ukraine foreign minister: No links between aid, investigations

When Mayberry refused and asserted his constitutionally protected right of free speech, the officer issued Mayberry a citation forbidding him from coming to the park for 30 days, PJI said.

Mayberry already has obtaining a ruling overturning the citation. Ray Hacke, a lawyer based in Oregon for PJI, appealed Mayberry's citation to the city auditor, who agreed it violated Mayberry's free speech rights under both the Oregon and federal constitutions.

"Accordingly, the hearing officer invalidated Mayberry’s exclusion from the public park, which is a traditional public forum where free speech is supposed to be at its freest," PJI said.

Mayberry filed the lawsuit, however, because he he wanted "to send a message to the city that further infringements on freedoms of speech and religion will not be tolerated."

PJI said Portland "has a history of showing hostility toward Christian evangelists, with the city's mistreatment of Mayberry as the latest example. Further, the city violated a permanent injunction which prohibits the ejection of preachers from city parks without probable cause."

The action brought by PJI on behalf of Mayberry under the 1964 Civil Rights Act seeks more than $300,000 in damages.

The city has been defeated several times in its attempts to censor Christian messages.

In Gathright v. City of Portland, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a permanent injunction preventing the city from removing without probable cause street preachers from city parks, which are traditional free-speech public forums.

Dacus, at the time, explained, "The city of Portland doesn't get to shut them down just because some people find their views distasteful or offensive."


Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message