|Cucker Tarlson: Understanding the Impeachment Charade|
Posted by: TEEBONE ģ |
Author Profile Mail author Edit
Understanding the Impeachment Charade
Washington scandals are moving at a record pace. It was only a week ago that The New York Times launched its unfair hit piece on Brett Kavanaugh. This is the Trump-era news cycle. Scandals that used to go on for months now seem to end in hours. Nothing illustrates this better than the bizarre Ukraine story weíre all living through. A week ago, no one had even heard of it. Then we were on the brink of impeachment because of it, and now it seems it may be over already.
The same angry news anchors who brought you Stormy Daniels and the Russia hoax now want you to know Big Orangeís days in the White House are over. Why? Because Donald Trump, they say, threatened to withhold military aid to Ukraine unless Ukraine did something bad to Joe Biden and his family. Supposedly, Trump was finished.
Once again, the mob turned out to be wrong. The administration released a transcript of the presidentís phone call with the Ukrainian head of state, and it says none of the things the news anchors claimed it would. Read it for yourself. Itís online. Try to find the extortion in there. There isnít any. Trump never even mentions military aid. Thereís certainly something unseemly about a president asking a foreign government to investigate an American citizen, but itís not illegal, and itís not all that different from three Democratic senatorsí writing a letter to Ukraine just last year demanding investigations into Trump.
Now that the call turns out to be nothing like what the media told us it would be, some on the left have started a conspiracy theory that the transcript canít be real; it must be doctored. These conspiracies arenít confined to weird corners of the internet. Democratic leaders Chuck Schumer and Adam Schiff have already questioned the trustworthiness of the transcript, despite the fact that thereís no evidence of wrongdoing. Numerous career national security officials ó many not fans of our president ó have access to the original call and would have to be in on any conspiracy.
Whatís driving all this insanity? Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, has been more honest about it than most. Green admitted it straight up: ďIím concerned that if we donít impeach this president, he will get reelected.Ē
Lots of Democrats, including many of todayís party leaders, stood up when Bill Clinton was impeached to give impassioned speeches about the perils of taking away the American peopleís choice. Hereís todayís impeachment ringleader, Rep. Jerry Nadler, in 1998:
ďThe impeachment of a president is an undoing of a national election. And one of the reasons we all feel so angry about what they are doing is that they are ripping asunder our votes. They are telling us that our votes donít count.Ē
And hereís Nancy Pelosi in 1998 on the hatred behind the Clinton impeachment push:
ďToday, the Republican majority is not judging the president with fairness but impeaching him with a vengeance Ö We are here today because the Republicans in the House are paralyzed with hatred of President Clinton. And until the Republicans free themselves of this hatred, our country will suffer.Ē
Sadly, Nadler and Pelosi were right in 1998. Republicans should not have impeached Clinton, and they paid the price. Democrats today hate Trump. Itís not about justice or truth. What they care about is winning the 2020 presidential election. Democratic leaders have decided that impeaching Trump is essential if theyíre going to win next year. So theyíre staking everything on this bizarre, flimsy scandal that the rest of us can barely understand.
Personal attacks on Trump have proven ineffective. If calling him a racist or a traitor actually worked, Hillary Clinton would be running for reelection right about now. Thatís not going to work. If you want to beat Trump, make a case on the issues. He won on the issues. So make a countercase. But the geniuses canít figure that out.
In the end, the loser in this impeachment nonsense is likely to be Biden, who, you will recall, is the apparent front-runner. Heís supposed to be the safe choice, the guy whoís going to reenergize the Obama coalition and win back the White House. Yet Democrats have now in effect demanded that we spend the next six months talking about Biden and his sonís alleged corruption. Thatís whatís at the core of this Ukraine story.
The issues arenít really complicated. Why in the world would a Ukrainian company pay Hunter Biden $50,000 a month? We still havenít heard an answer. If weíre talking about Ukraine and impeachment, weíre talking about Bidenís alleged corruption. That canít help his campaign for president. In fact, itís likely to tank it. It looks like sabotage, really. They must have gamed this up. Or maybe Democrats have just become so obsessed with destroying Trump that theyíre accidentally destroying themselves.
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM
LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATEDemocrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.
|Post Reply | Recommend | Alert||Previous | Next | Current page|