Online users
???: MessageBartb: Message  

Yeah, but IMO, it sucks.
Re: Don't the cops already collect dna at every chance? -- robertb Post Reply Top of thread Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE

01/04/2019, 23:49:53

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Supreme Court Rules DNA Can Be Taken After Arrest : NPR

https://www.npr.org/2013/06/03/188397999/supreme-court-rules-arrest-dna-collection-reasonable

Jun 3, 2013 ... The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that police can routinely take DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of a...


Scalia, a staunch conservative, in a rare oral dissent from the bench, excoriated the majority. He said the court has never held that the government can conduct general suspicionless searches of anyone it arrests, and by doing so in this opinion, the court, he said, casts aside "a bedrock rule of Fourth Amendment law." Scalia lacerated the court's assertion that the DNA sample was taken to identify King, saying that it "taxes the credulity of the credulous."


AFAIC, that validates my opinion.


TEE




LIBERTY HAS NO EXPIRATION DATE

Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.



Modified by TEEBONE at Fri, Jan 04, 2019, 23:55:08


Post Reply | Recommend | Alert Where am I? Original Top of thread Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message