Online users
???: Message   

Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

03/11/2018, 15:00:10

Author Profile Mail author Edit

Half of all F-35s delivered by Lockheed Martin are non-operational as negotiation continues on new contract

Alex Hollings

Just under half of the $100 million a piece F-35 Joint Strike Fighters delivered by Lockheed Martin
thus far are non-operational, according to statements made by Vice Adm.
Mat Winter, head of the Defense Department’s F-35 Joint Program Office.

The F-35 program, which has received significant political support
thanks to development and manufacturing operations tied to the program
employing people in nearly all of America’s fifty states, has suffered
repeated delays, setbacks and cost overruns since its inception. Now,
with only 51% of the 280 aircraft delivered actually functional, much of the blame can once again be placed on mismanagement of the program at its onset.

The culprit behind many of the non-operational F-35s was a policy
called “concurrency,” wherein F-35 production began before testing of
the aircraft was completed. The idea was to get the ball moving on
construction of the advanced fighters before the anticipated decades
long shake down process was completed, then the early iterations of the
jet would be brought back in for upgrades once testing of the final
version of the platform was complete.

After years of issues, however, the value of the concurrency approach
doesn’t seem to be there. Because most of the first generation
aircrafts are not even operational, and budgetary concerns have prioritized the construction of new
jets over the refit of old ones… it’s difficult to see what value the
U.S. military actually got out of the 140 or so F-35s that have been
delivered but can’t actually take to the skies. It’s possible that they
could be refit for use, while others may eventually be cannibalized for
parts as the functional F-35s begin to wear down components, but either
possibility represents a massive waste of money.

Most of the defects Lockheed has been tasked with addressing have come as a result of the aircraft’s advanced stealth capabilities, according to the company’s vice president.

Flt 434 piloted by LtCol Tom Fields from NAS Patuxent River, MD
conducts external weapons testing on 01 FEB 2016 (US Navy photo)

At a price tag of between $100 and $120 million each,
somewhere between $1.4 and nearly $1.8 billion worth of 5th generation
fighters have now been built to do nothing more but sit on the tarmac
and collect dust – waiting for a time when they will either be
disassembled back into the components they came from, or will undergo
mechanical refits to turn them into functioning aircraft. While it was
always expected that the early generation F-35s would require refits, it
seems unlikely that having just about half of the entire global fleet
of F-35s non-operational was ever a part of the plan.

The biggest concern for the future of the F-35 program, however,
isn’t the mistakes of the past, it’s the expenses of the future. Winter
is currently working to negotiate the price of the next batch of F-35s
set to be built, and despite the production’s track record of setbacks
and failures, Lockheed, it seems, is still negotiating with the upper
hand, knowing all too well that, at this point, the program is
considered by many to be “too big to fail.”

“The price is coming down, but it’s not coming down fast enough,” Winter said.
“I will tell you that I am not as satisfied with the collaboration and
cooperation by Lockheed Martin. They could be much more cooperative and
collaborative, and we could seal this deal faster; we could. They choose
not to, and that’s a negotiating tactic.”

Feature image courtesy of the Department of Defense


Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert   Previous | Next | Current page