Online users
???: Message???: Message  

Post Reply   Forum

Posted by: TEEBONE ®

03/10/2018, 00:46:04

Author Profile Mail author Edit

John P. Warren - Two Worlds

John P. Warren

The polar world view Progressives push about core social issues
remains unmoored from realities most Americans value, and they persist
in attempting to sail us into the icebergs. 

Festering like a boil
on our national life, for example, is the matter of immigration. It
should go without saying that each nation has the sovereign right to
decide who enters, when, and for what reason. The United Nations’ 193
members, possibly excluding Eurozone freethinkers, but including our own
continental neighbors claim that right and obligation, yet Progressives
insist on open borders, the goal of which drives at the dilution of
citizenship, of our national identity. It’s as if Progressives would
have us live in homes without lockable doors and windows, so that
strangers may break in, willy-nilly, demanding to be fed, clothed, and
educated. Repudiating their pledge to “preserve, protect, and defend,”
elected Progressives like Pelosi and Schumer would have us be
defenseless against whatever violence some illegals inflict. 

slaveholding southerners of two centuries ago, Progressives hold high
the banner of Nullification, insisting that cities and states can
legally supersede federal statutes and impose sanctuary laws at whim.
While many have thought the price of Nullification theory to have been
paid in full at Appomattox with the blood of 620,000 men, Progressives
seek to construct a political structure where laws apply to
traditionalists and nationalists, but not to miscreants in their brood
of the coddled, protected, and entitled.

Not to be missed in all
this theater is that Nullification of immigration laws is the trojan
horse. The real prize, should Progressives be allowed to succeed, will
be their laws allowing illegals to vote in any election at the
discretion of Progressives in power. It’s already happening.

for the issue of gun control, one fact unlikely to be reported by
left-wing media tells us much. According to a Paul Kengor piece in Crisis Magazine, “26
of the 27 deadliest mass shooters in American history all happened to
share one thing in common.” Each of them, he asserts, was, “raised
without his biological father.”

Consider a society where Progressives have proclaimed traditional marriage to be passé, that
parties of whatever combination or partnership status are entitled to
obtain and raise children as a matter of right, that father-figures are
unnecessary, and are, in fact, irrelevant in their brave new world.
Given the millennia of Darwinian evolution revealing the best parenting
model to be a mixed gender arrangement, it’s a wonder that in the six
decades since the advent of LBJ’s Great Society, the list of the
murdered is as small as it is. In a welfare state which encouraged
fatherless homes as a condition of benefit, we might not be surprised at
the numberless killings committed by uncompassed young men raised in
that environment, but how do we explain the mass slaughters committed by
fatherless shooters with free access to expensive assault weapons? 

seems demanded of today’s children. Many do no chores, cut grass,
shovel snow, or take summer jobs. Life is buried in social media, video
games, and activities to keep them busy, with little time left for
family and community responsibility. Of the 26.5 million U.S. children
between 13 and 18 years of age, 20%--or over five million children walk around with a mental health disorder, and for some, their resort is to destruction and murder, themselves and others. 

not about guns. It’s about us. And Progressives know it, but they
hammer on absurd gun laws because they must have societal control to
further their dystopic dream. 

Progressives have convinced much of the citizenry and the courts that women’s rights have supremacy over human rights. Roe v. Wade
was just the beginning, and it wasn’t long before demanded abortions,
even until the time of birth, could not be restricted if a state was
willing to permit them and a doctor was willing to perform them. Even
aborted children born alive had no right to life, according to Barack

Progressives were vehemently opposed to abortion rights
until they were for it: the moment they perceived an opportunity to
snare the women’s vote. Given time and information, however, Americans
remain an independent bunch, often unwilling to take orders from
lock-step Democrats. According to a January 2018, CBS News poll, 53% of
all respondents—almost identical in percentage to all Independents
polled—think abortion should be available under stricter limits or not
permitted at all. Remarkably, a third of Democrats feel the same. Who
represents them? 

However one feels about abortion, it
seems clear that sanctity of life is a principle underlying all three of
these issues. If Kate Steinle’s life is valueless compared to open
borders and unfettered rights for illegals, then, too bad for the
Steinles and the legion of victims of violent crime by illegals. If the
Parkland dead are merely statistics to be laid upon the altar of privacy
for the mentally unstable, then, too bad for the victims and families
of those 27 mass shootings, and the untold thousands more.

want their world of entitlements and new-found rights for those who
give them power. As for an American Way of Life with traditional
marriage, individual responsibility, and rights to life, liberty, and
the pursuit of happiness—apparently, it’s all “racist” to them.

seems that most Conservatives and Independents, as well as a
significant number of Democrats want a world where human life is
sacrosanct, where individual rights are respected, and where there’s
accountability under law.

Lincoln reminded us that a house divided
cannot stand, but a century and a half after the Civil War, the
responsible adults in our nation must be wise enough to stand against
the Progressive furies and abide by the very principles upon which we
were founded. One. Nation. Under. God.


Democrats wouldn't buy a clue if it was government subsidized.

Post Reply | Recommend | Alert View All   Previous | Next | Current page

Replies to this message