Post: Post Reply: It's alright for hard-science or other purely fact-based info - but useless in anything involving any manner of "interpretation" or " political analysis". by LateForLunch

Original Message: It's alright for hard-science or other purely fact-based info - but useless in anything involving any manner of "interpretation" or " political analysis".
What Wikipedia (and most other ACF sources) represent as a "rational dialectic" is invariably a Marxist or Sophistic dialectic charading as a Rational dialectic. Wikipedia describes Fox News as a "conservative" organization, yet makes no reference to any blatantly leftist similar network as "leftist", "liberal" or "ultra-liberal". So according to Wikipedia, there ARE no liberal, ultra-liberal or leftist news organizations in the United States. heh That's one reason why I have never donated to them, and never will - until the ACF manager(s) die and/or are replaced by normal people.

Original Message: It's alright for hard-science or other purely fact-based info - but useless in anything involving any manner of "interpretation" or " political analysis".

What Wikipedia (and most other ACF sources) represent as a "rational dialectic" is invariably a Marxist or Sophistic dialectic charading as a Rational dialectic.

Wikipedia describes Fox News as a "conservative" organization, yet makes no reference to any blatantly leftist similar network as "leftist", "liberal" or "ultra-liberal". So according to Wikipedia, there ARE no liberal, ultra-liberal or leftist news organizations in the United States. heh

That's one reason why I have never donated to them, and never will - until the ACF manager(s) die and/or are replaced by normal people.

Back Post Reply

Name
  Register

Password

E-Mail

Topic

Reply options Notify original author     Private reply   All replies are private

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view     Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL