Post: Post Reply: I gotta go with Primo on this, Primecut. by LateForLunch

Original Message: I gotta go with Primo on this, Primecut.
I took Ockahm's Razor to the purports in the article (finely written as it is) and came up with a shredded hypothesis. For one thing, it is inconceivable that the 'Crats would go to all that trouble for a candidate who has been as unpopular as Hill-O-Lies. Her husband's dallying with Jeffery Epstein and his own failure to help get down ballot candidates elected over the years since he left office show the Clinton star falling toward the horizon. Another concern is the amount of confession of error on the part of the DNC in electing two such obviously-inferior candidates would be (QED) unprecedented. There are other concerns with similar multiple assumptions required.

Original Message: I gotta go with Primo on this, Primecut.

I took Ockahm's Razor to the purports in the article (finely written as it is) and came up with a shredded hypothesis.

For one thing, it is inconceivable that the 'Crats would go to all that trouble for a candidate who has been as unpopular as Hill-O-Lies. Her husband's dallying with Jeffery Epstein and his own failure to help get down ballot candidates elected over the years since he left office show the Clinton star falling toward the horizon.

Another concern is the amount of confession of error on the part of the DNC in electing two such obviously-inferior candidates would be (QED) unprecedented.

There are other concerns with similar multiple assumptions required.

Back Post Reply

Name
  Register

Password

E-Mail

Topic

Reply options Notify original author     Private reply   All replies are private

M
E
S
S
A
G
E
HTML tags allowed in message body. Browser view     Display HTML as text.

Link URL

Link Title

Image URL